Recently there was a "hullabaloo" --ergo, fuss, about the waste of money spent on anti-depressants by the NHS (National Health). No argument from me as I suppose many people are asking for anti-depressant drugs as their lifestyles get out of hand. Financial problems, emotional problems and stress seem to be modern day life-style maladies and many people are looking for a quick fix.
The genuinely depressed count in amongst the figures of drugs dispensed and they are the people who really need help. Depression is an extremely complicated life-threatening illness and those suffering from the various types of depression often find relief from chemicals that tackle a chemical imbalance in the brain. Research has shown that many depressive people, often suffering really negative feelings ranging from melancholy to suicide have been helped by modern drugs . By the way I am making my own assessment here due to personal use of these drugs for what is essentially an inherited condition. I am reporting on reports but assessing them due to my own experience.
What irks me is that the name Prozac seemed to come up often and I quote from a section of one article: "----patients are demanding drugs like prozac even though the drug provides little relief." The article continues to postulate on Prozac and similar drugs being ineffective and "no better than a placebo."
I'm not surprised. Prozac is a twenty year old drug and has long been overtaken by the Effexors and Cimbalta's of the world --and many new others since then. Today's anti-depressant has been developed to be more effective with less side-effects. It is irresponsible to say that these drugs do not help--they have saved lives--and it is irresponsible to use Prozac as an example of a modern drug.
I'm guessing that the good that modern anti-depressants do is being overshadowed by an emphasis on an old medication which is not as good as its modern counterparts. I'm also guessing that the press has not done thorough research.
Finally, you will probably find that certain doctors who believe that these drugs are a waste of money are negating the good that some drugs do for the improvement in the quality of life of thousands, either for publicity or through ignorance.
What are the Joeusers' views?