And I'd like to have some say in the decision.
Perhaps some of you know that there are moves afoot in the UK to transplant organs from the deceased to those needing them without the consent of the family.
Prime Minister Gordon Brown has decided that this may be a way of saving more lives. He is right but the decision is not his to make (echoes of Edinburgh body snatching come to mind when a Scotsman is involved!). When a government that is mired in enough problems as it is, seeks to pounce on the cadaver then I think they are trying to divert traffic away from what: Peter Hain? Northern Rock? The shambolic cabinet Brown has created? How on earth do they expect to save a heart when they turned their backs on a lonely teacher in the Sudan?
Let's get my body in here. Anyone can have my liver (hopelessly over-abused), my kidneys ( over-filtered and close to shut down), my lungs ( Marlboro Man shot them with his Colt long ago), My eyes are fairly OK if the new owner doesn't mind buying thick lenses to see an eye chart, and my heart is in fair condition if you count a '47 Chevvy's motor is also that way.
Adnauseam shifts to serious mode: There are not enough donors to save the lives of people needing transplants and we all need to bear this in mind when we climb into bed and the sheet is finally pulled over our heads. We need to educate people that some of our organs can save worthy lives. We need to educate our families too. A donor card should be issued to everyone and, like a living will, we should decide whether we are going to help others by donating organs. The family should be happy with this as it is a sensitive subject . In short, we need to educate for it is a worthy cause. I'll give every part of my body to medicine and I'll educate my family accordingly .
But, in principle, I'm not going to accept a government making what is a very personal decision for me! They have other things to do.
How do Joeusers feel about this?