How do we balance the choices made for him?
Forgive me but I'm a South African and therefore not really entitled to question choices made by the US Government. I can't figure out why Ahmedinajad is allowed to speak to Columbia University but not pay homage at Ground Zero. Before you hurl missiles I believe the little Iranian has no right, as Rice said, to pay any sort of homage at Ground Zero. So why does he have the right to speak at a prestigious university? Are there double standards here? He has a right to speak for his country at the UN but why should he be allowed to bullshit students about "no need for nuclear warfare" et al. Do we not agree that the man is as conniving as a snake pretending to be dead? Do we not agree that the little man has a double agenda--as many of these little revolutionites do, and is playing fickle-mouse in Lion country?
This sneaky "axis" President who curses George Bush liberally, should have been walked from his plane to the UN, made his vitriolic stand (although you never know with hypocritical revolutionaries), and walked back to his plane again. Is Columbia University looking for some sort of prestige with it's choice of speaker or is it feeling out a bit of the truth? They will not get it.