Is he really as bad as Harding?
I study American History--it hasalways fascinated me. The modern political scene evades me simply because I do not keep up with it. However, reading the Houston Chronicle online I wondered what Joeusers think of these two statements:
"Given his current trajectory and speed, Bush is on course to be the worst President since at least Warren G. Harding (I know a fair bit about billiards in the White House--my comment).That would mean that Bush would sink past Jimmy Carter, which is no mean feat."
AND: "If Bush is , as he said Thursday, with British Prime Minister Blair at his side, disappointed by the 'pace of success' in Iraq, can he imagine how disappointing his own performance has been at almost every turn over the last six years."
Watching George Bush, on podium with Tony ( Britain's bullshitting answer to rampant inflation), I got the distinct feeling that these two men wanted to conquer the World --a World similar to Mars.)
Let me be serious for a moment and say that these men worry me greatly.
Comments please from Joeusers.